well, I think it will bridge the gap really...its an official release in that it has tags and was generated through the release process, but I hesitate to shove it out into the main repositories only to follow up with an alpha 2 in a few weeks..
jesse On 4/20/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored). Cheers, Rahul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <continuum-dev@maven.apache.org> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1 > On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into >> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging >> setup? > > The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user > list. Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue. > > Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and > releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason. I created > people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a > development build.) > > How about putting it under > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ? > > BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE. I don't see > them in my last Continuum build. > > -- > Wendy
-- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
