well, my thought is that its not like anyone would be coding against the modules in continuum as a dependency, so why bother putting these minor releases into the main repositories? We don't even deploy updated snapshots of continuum modules much if at all..
jesse On 4/20/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think it's a pb to release alpha in 2 weeks and put them in the main repo. Emmanuel Jesse McConnell a écrit : > well, I think it will bridge the gap really...its an official release > in that it has tags and was generated through the release process, but > I hesitate to shove it out into the main repositories only to follow > up with an alpha 2 in a few weeks.. > > jesse > > On 4/20/07, Rahul Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Since this would be a proper release (not a build), I'd imagine this >> going on to the main repository (and subsequently mirrored). >> >> Cheers, >> Rahul >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <continuum-dev@maven.apache.org> >> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:14 AM >> Subject: Re: Preparing for continuum-1.1-alpha-1 >> >> >> > On 4/20/07, Jesse McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> What do you guys think? just call a vote on it and get it pushed into >> >> the wild or can we just do the alpha's like this through the staging >> >> setup? >> > >> > The vote makes it an official release tha can be annouced on the user >> > list. Whether to put it on the mirrors is a separate issue. >> > >> > Many projects use people.apache.org/builds for both snapshots and >> > releases that aren't mirrored for whatever reason. I created >> > people.a.o/maven/archiva for archiva-0.9-alpha-1 (which remains a >> > development build.) >> > >> > How about putting it under >> > http://people.apache.org/builds/maven/continuum/1.1-alpha-1 ? >> > >> > BTW, please make sure it contains LICENSE and NOTICE. I don't see >> > them in my last Continuum build. >> > >> > -- >> > Wendy >> >> > >
-- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
