On 25.08.2014 04:21, Martín Ferrari wrote: > Hello again, > > We had a very productive session this morning. We had the chance to hear > individual accounts of past DebConf experience, and I think everybody > learned something from it. > > You can read the meeting minutes in the wiki page: > https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/DebconfOrganizationWorkingGroup > > We want to invite you again for another session tomorrow, so we can > continue talking about past experiences. We want to hear more people, > and give the chance to today's participants to talk again, if they want to. > > After this session, we will be able to produce a list of some concrete > problems to solve, and hopefully some inspiration for solutions. > > Again, every person will talk for at most 5 minutes, without > interruptions or responses.
So my remote talk (about things not yet in wiki): I had some discussion with Vorlon about network and video team. I confess that some parts were to me really surprises (I'm also following video-team as video-team volunteer). He told me: We wrote to the list about requirements, leadership, etc., we had no answer and so we put local people in charge, etc. I see two problems: One: we should be more active on looking replies from past/local teams (repeat pings/ messages). I think it could help avoiding misunderstanding and possibly double work. But the real problem is the missing replies. For this reason I was convinced by vorlon that we need people in charge for specific tasks/teams, so that team will look minutes, ev. attend meeting and provide smooth information exchanges between teams. Note: the active part is also difficult, it needs a person who know many details of debconf (previously this task was done informally by moray [and his comments]). So I think we should be more active on finding reply, but we should work a lot harder on getting replies But this is also a global problem in communications. We had clear discussion about Le Camp type (and agreed to do the experiment) and no-DebCamp in this DC, but also such information was lost by many members. How to pass important communications? ciao cate Note: the problem with lack of replies happens also no local team: the detailed planing phase is done very early, but the execution is done near a year after such planing (so many locals will skip most of interim communication) > > The second meeting is scheduled on Monday, at 13:30 in room 338. Notes > will be taken in the wiki again. > > Tincho, > on behalf of the DebConf Chairs. > _______________________________________________ > Debconf-team mailing list > Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org > http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team > _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team