On 7/18/18 7:03 AM, Marc Dequènes (duck) wrote: > It has been brought to my attention that this package, its name and the > name of the binaries and further content was deemed offensive. This was > already raised in the past (~2012 IIRC) but the package was reintroduced > and has been in the archive since then. > > Since this is a childish naming which was not intended at being > insulting, I gave a hand to package this useful tool. I would have > preferred it renamed though. > > This thread is about giving your opinion and discussing with upstream > about it, and us DD to decide the fate of this package. I hope this > would help draft proper policy criteria about what we consider not > acceptable.
Shouldn't liboobs be removed or renamed too, for the same reasons? And those other packages too: buthead butteraugli assimp ... Cheers. Dan