Hi Dmitry, On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:40:46PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Thursday, 19 July 2018 10:50:20 AM AEST Ian Jackson wrote: > > I think this naming, and the iconography, is all very unfortunate. > > IMO it is not compatible with Debian's Diversity Statement (which as > > ou know was ratified by an overwhelming majority of DDs). > > You are overreacting. Name of the package may be tasteless but still not bad > enough to justify exclusion. I fear of misuse of diversity statement to > justify morally distorted decisions against something mild like this > particular case.
I disagree that this is "mild". weboob itself is fine, maybe. But there are various other binaries inside the weboob packages that aren't, at least not so much: wetboobs handjoob boobsize boobtracker like, seriously. > Here is an example: I'm aware of legal human name that is offensive and > inappropriate in another language. Nobody in the right mind would use > diversity statement against people with such names. Even bringing such matter > to attention of a person is awkward to say the least and may be even > insulting on its own. > Asking person to change his name because it is unpleasant to us would be > beyond rude. This is true, but not relevant to the issue at hand (which is about weboob). [...] -- Could you people please use IRC like normal people?!? -- Amaya Rodrigo Sastre, trying to quiet down the buzz in the DebConf 2008 Hacklab