Hi Jonathan, On Fri, 2018-07-20 at 07:47 +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:34:19PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > > On Friday, 20 July 2018 12:50:12 AM AEST Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > Have you read Matthew Vernon's reply to OP in this thread? Does > > > that not > > > explain it? > > > > Matthew did not convince me. IMHO his explanation is weak as it > > boils down to > > "there are many problems like this and we should fix this problem > > because > > there are other similar ones"... > > This suggests that you did understand Matthew's reply, but the rest of > your message implies that you didn't. Honestly I'm not sure I've got the > skill to explain it to you, I'm not sure I could do a better job than > Matthew at summarizing the issue. I'm afraid I must bow out, focus on > fixing the problem, and leave it to others or to self-study for you to > understand it, if you wish to.
I can't help but understand your message as "if you don't agree, you haven't understood" which I don't find very helpful. Is that what you wanted to say? Ansgar