On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:02:23PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
I see your point and I agree with you yet renaming might still be inappropriate and/or ineffective. I'd like to see stronger justification for replacing uncomfortable reference to part of human body because why should it be uncomfortable?
Have you read Matthew Vernon's reply to OP in this thread? Does that not explain it?
If double "O" is a problem then how are we not offended by Google?
Because double "O" is not the problem.
If we swap body part reference to another body part like "leg" or "arm", it becomes just ridiculous.
Do you mean: it would be ridiculous to perform s/boobs/arm/ in the package? Indeed it would be. Or do you mean it would be ridiculous to object to *arm* in packages or binary names? Nobody is doing that. Or do you mean something else? -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Jonathan Dowland ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://jmtd.net ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ Please do not CC me, I am subscribed to the list.