Paul Jakma <p...@jakma.org> writes: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, Ole Streicher wrote: > >> Paul Jakma <p...@jakma.org> writes: >>> The people involved in (3) - Linux Foundation, Cumulus Networks, >>> 6WIND, Big Switch Networks, etc. - refuse to acknowledge the legal >>> reality that the code of (3) is covered by the GPL licence of the code >>> of (2), and refuse to honour the conditions required by the GPL - see >>> David Lamparter's mail. >> >> And which statement of the GPL do they violate in your opinion? > > a) They are very clear they are /not/ distributing the source code under > the GPL licence. > > b) They are not complying with Section 1.
In GPLv2, section 1 allows the distribution of unmodified source code, if the license information is distributed unmodified as well. Which unmodified GPL source code do they distribute without the licensing information?
