Paul Jakma <p...@jakma.org> writes: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2019, Ole Streicher wrote: >> Paul Jakma <p...@jakma.org> writes: >>> b) They are not complying with Section 1. >> >> In GPLv2, section 1 allows the distribution of unmodified source code, >> if the license information is distributed unmodified as well. > >> Which unmodified GPL source code do they distribute without the >> licensing information? > > They are distributing files which were created outwith of Quagga, > which explicitly refer to, make use of and rely upon facilities > provided by GPL code obtained from Quagga (which obtained code from > GNU Zebra before it).
This does not match section 1, which allows the distribution of unmodified files along with the proper license information. Again: Could you please point to the section in the GPL that is violated? Best regards Ole