@Phil: hmm can be but the framework would create its own overhead which would be avoided with a dedicated solution, no? Well thought gain was great for small investment but ok to postpone it Le 5 nov. 2013 18:54, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Well I didnt test sirona in prod but when using jamon (same kind of > framework) locks were creating a serious overhead on some benches. Not the > most important but enough to try to solve it. > > That said we are not yet in 1.0 so Im ok to wait for more serious > feedbacks if you think it is better > Le 5 nov. 2013 18:48, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <rmannibu...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >> > Oh sorry, that's what I said early, in a real app no or not enough to >> be an >> > issue buy on simple apps or very high thrououtput apps yes. >> > Le 5 nov. 2013 07:00, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> a écrit : >> > >> > > That isn't what I meant. >> > > >> > > Do you really think that more than one metric has to update >> (increment, >> > > say) at precisely the same time? >> > > >> > >> >> I realize that is what you said. Do you have any serious examples where >> metrics have to be updated all or nothing? >> >
