Feel free to merge your changes into Tika to update the barebones implementation I contributed there:
https://github.com/apache/tika/blob/master/tika-java7/src/main/java/org/apache/tika/filetypedetector/TikaFileTypeDetector.java Cheers, Peter On 16 March 2017 at 14:46, Schalk Cronjé <ysb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have already implemented FileTypeDetector using Tika -> > https://github.com/ysb33r/nio2-filedetector-tika. > > > On 16/03/2017 09:14, Matt Sicker wrote: >> >> There's also a ton of in-depth features like file attributes, ACLs, other >> permissions, etc. Then there's a bit of overlap with security concerns >> that >> come with that. It certainly provides a rather broad matrix of features >> that are possible to expose. There's also FileTypeDetector which has >> functional overlap with Tika. Also, the dependencies in vfs2 are pretty >> out >> of date at this point. >> >> On 15 March 2017 at 22:27, Schalk W. Cronjé <ysb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> The ZIP implementation is very basic. I've started exoerimenting with >>> this >>> quite a while ago writing a RAM filesystem as to experiment w.ith the >>> complexities. >>> I would definitely be interested in working with you on this even if it >>> is >>> only for shared learning. As one dives deeper into it there's a lot of >>> 'devil in details' and two minds are better than one to bounce ideas >>> around. >>> >>> >>> Sent from my Samsung device >>> >>> -------- Original message -------- >>> From: Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> Date: 16/03/2017 08:42 (GMT+05:30) >>> To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> >>> Subject: [VFS] Interest in starting a Java 7 FileSystem-based version? >>> >>> Ralph has mentioned in the past an idea about rewriting commons-vfs using >>> java.nio.file from Java 7. I was playing with this API today attempting >>> to >>> abstract some S3 file operations using < >>> https://github.com/Upplication/Amazon-S3-FileSystem-NIO2> and found that >>> the API is pretty nice. OpenJDK already contains implementations for the >>> normal file system and zip files if I recall correctly (so probably also >>> jar files). >>> >>> Anyways, if we were to go forward with starting work on this, should we >>> just make a commons-vfs3 branch in the vfs repo? Or does this belong in >>> the >>> sandbox? >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >>> >> >> > > > -- > Schalk W. Cronjé > Twitter / Ello / Toeter : @ysb33r > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
