-1 I don't really see the point in an extra jar for the ByteBuffer. If you want users to be able to use the powerful Mina ByteBuffer, why not release an independent jar just for this goal?
-- Jeroen Brattinga 2007/1/21, Hanson Char <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
+1 On 1/20/07, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > The MINA ByteBuffer classes can be used without MINA for easier > manipulation > of NIO ByteBuffers. For now, they belong to mina-core JAR, but we could > split it even further to the two JARs; mina-bytebuffer, mina-core, and > mina-transport-nio. By this sepration, we could remove some bad cyclic > dependencies between transport implementation and the core API and allow > users enjoy the access to the powerful byte buffer manipulation without > using MINA. > > WDYT? > > Trustin > -- > what we call human nature is actually human habit > -- > http://gleamynode.net/ > -- > PGP key fingerprints: > * E167 E6AF E73A CBCE EE41 4A29 544D DE48 FE95 4E7E > * B693 628E 6047 4F8F CFA4 455E 1C62 A7DC 0255 ECA6 > >
