Fost, we do need to get all of those references to HOTWAX out of this theme - but that was an oversight not a marketing ploy :) Looking forward to getting this all resolved, but I don't think any of these things should stop us from using this one - only encourage everyone to make it better!
Cheers, Tim -- Tim Ruppert HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com o:801.649.6594 f:801.649.6595 ----- "Ryan Foster" <ryan.fos...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > I'm not sure if I would say that not having a footer is an issue. > Most of what was in the footer has been moved and grouped more > logically in the header. For instance, the secondary apps have been > > grouped with the main apps, and the time zone selection has been > grouped with the other user preferences such as theme selection and > language. The XHTML and CSS icons have been removed, but if you > clicked on the XHTML icon you see that the page does not validate, > having several errors. > > Ryan Foster > HotWax Media > 801.671.0769 > ryan.fos...@hotwaxmedia.com > > > > > On Apr 14, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > > > So far, I found also that : > > * there is no footer anymore > > * an issue with favicon.png. > > * when you choose a theme you have to use Cancel after to apply it. > > > It's like if the last view feature was not working. > > * the log in webtools is no longer colored > > * it's not easy to select the PDF version of an order in order view > > > > HTH > > > > Jacques > > > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> > >> I agree with Hans, > >> > >> From: "Hans Bakker" <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> > >>> Hi David, > >>> > >>> from a marketing point of view I agree but there are a lot of > >>> errors in > >>> this schema to correct and that before tuesday? Not very > realistic. > >>> > >>> after 5 minutes of testing: > >>> 1. search results in party: partyId not clickable > >>> (error: HOTWAX.buildSearch is not a function) > >>> 2. Although the sponsoring from hotwax is very much appreciated, > > >>> wasn't > >>> there an agreement not to use the name in the code but only in > other > >>> areas as svn log and ? > >> > >> If you search in all files you will find 59 occurences of > hotwax... > >> > >>> 3. In general the screens are now formatted much to wide because > of > >>> spaces and character sizes and other reasons, have a look at : > >>> https://localhost3:8443/projectmgr/control/MyTimesheet > >> > >> Yes, The default size is too large, you need to have a wide screen > > >> to see it correctly. Especially with IE with the most current size > > >> screen used in the world (1024*768). > >> And even using FF3, Chrome Opera or Safari with a wide screen > >> (1680*1050) you get an issue when looking, for instance, at the > >> Store (the store infos are wrapped). And I don't speak about having > > >> a panel open at left, etc. > >> Also the orderview in only one column is not easy to read. > >> > >> Also maybe we could have a title for each column of Business Area > > >> (BTW this needs to be internationalized, maybe some others > >> also...). Something like "Main applications" "Secondary > >> applications", maybe 2 colors also ? > >> > >> This said, it's really a great effort and I think that there is not > > >> much to be done to be near perfection (at least nowadays ;o) > >> > >> Yes thank you for that ! > >> > >> Jacques > >> > >>> Let me emphasize that Hotwax and Brainfood brought OFBiz to the > next > >>> level especially in the framework and graphical design areas. > >>> Thank you! > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Hans > >>> > >>> On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 16:21 -0600, David E Jones wrote: > >>>> Now that we have some nice themes in place I'm wondering if we > >>>> shouldn't change the default theme, especially for the back-end. > > >>>> The > >>>> old blue-grey-flat theme (which we should probably move to a > theme > >>>> component) is functional and I suppose lightweight too, but > perhaps > >>>> doesn't give the best first impression. > >>>> > >>>> Right now we have 2 alternative themes for the back-end (the > >>>> bluelight > >>>> theme and the smoothfeather theme which is meant to look like the > > >>>> new > >>>> web site), and 1 alternative theme for ecommerce (the multiflex > > >>>> theme). > >>>> > >>>> One issue with all of these is they haven't been tested as > >>>> thoroughly > >>>> as the old stuff, but I'm not too worried about that because > >>>> there are > >>>> issues with the new default lots of people will see it soon and > we > >>>> should be able to get things fixed pretty fast. In my own testing > > >>>> both > >>>> of the back-end ones seem pretty solid (I haven't played with > the > >>>> ecommerce one yet). > >>>> > >>>> Anyway, please respond with your thoughts on this. I considered > >>>> opening a vote, but a general discussion is probably better first > > >>>> (and > >>>> a vote may not be needed depending on how this discussion goes). > >>>> > >>>> BTW, yes, this is for marketing purposes and should happen before > > >>>> the > >>>> release branch next Tuesday. > >>>> > >>>> -David > >>>> > >>> -- > >>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > >>> > >> > > > >
