Awesome - thanks for the follow up.  I think it got patched up earlier, so it's 
probably just waiting on the commit (if it's not in there already).  Good stuff.

Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com

o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595

----- "Ryan Foster" <ryan.fos...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:

> The references have been removed and the patch was sent to David.
> 
> Ryan Foster
> HotWax Media
> 801.671.0769
> ryan.fos...@hotwaxmedia.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 14, 2009, at 8:48 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
> 
> > Fost, we do need to get all of those references to HOTWAX out of  
> > this theme - but that was an oversight not a marketing ploy :)   
> > Looking forward to getting this all resolved, but I don't think any 
> 
> > of these things should stop us from using this one - only encourage 
> 
> > everyone to make it better!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Tim
> > --
> > Tim Ruppert
> > HotWax Media
> > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> >
> > o:801.649.6594
> > f:801.649.6595
> >
> > ----- "Ryan Foster" <ryan.fos...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not sure if I would say that not having a footer is an issue.
> >> Most of what was in the footer has been moved and grouped more
> >> logically in the header.  For instance, the secondary apps have
> been
> >>
> >> grouped with the main apps, and the time zone selection has been
> >> grouped with the other user preferences such as theme selection
> and
> >> language.  The XHTML and CSS icons have been removed, but if you
> >> clicked on the XHTML icon you see that the page does not validate,
> >> having several errors.
> >>
> >> Ryan Foster
> >> HotWax Media
> >> 801.671.0769
> >> ryan.fos...@hotwaxmedia.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 14, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> >>
> >>> So far, I found also that :
> >>> * there is no footer anymore
> >>> * an issue with favicon.png.
> >>> * when you choose a theme you have to use Cancel after to apply
> it.
> >>
> >>> It's like if the last view feature was not working.
> >>> * the log in webtools is no longer colored
> >>> * it's not easy to select the PDF version of an order in order
> view
> >>>
> >>> HTH
> >>>
> >>> Jacques
> >>>
> >>> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
> >>>> I agree with Hans,
> >>>>
> >>>> From: "Hans Bakker" <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com>
> >>>>> Hi David,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> from a marketing point of view I agree but there are a lot of
> >>>>> errors in
> >>>>> this schema to correct and that before tuesday? Not very
> >> realistic.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> after 5 minutes of testing:
> >>>>> 1. search results in party: partyId not clickable
> >>>>> (error: HOTWAX.buildSearch is not a function)
> >>>>> 2. Although the sponsoring from hotwax is very much
> appreciated,
> >>
> >>>>> wasn't
> >>>>> there an agreement not to use the name in the code but only in
> >> other
> >>>>> areas as svn log and ?
> >>>>
> >>>> If you search in all files you will find 59 occurences of
> >> hotwax...
> >>>>
> >>>>> 3. In general the screens are now formatted much to wide
> because
> >> of
> >>>>> spaces and character sizes and other reasons, have a look at :
> >>>>> https://localhost3:8443/projectmgr/control/MyTimesheet
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, The default size is too large, you need to have a wide
> screen
> >>
> >>>> to see it correctly. Especially with IE with the most current
> size
> >>
> >>>> screen used in the world (1024*768).
> >>>> And even using FF3, Chrome Opera or Safari with a wide screen
> >>>> (1680*1050) you get an issue when looking, for instance, at the
> >>>> Store (the store infos are wrapped). And I don't speak about
> having
> >>
> >>>> a panel open at left, etc.
> >>>> Also the orderview in only one column is not easy to read.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also maybe we could have a title for each column of Business
> Area
> >>
> >>>> (BTW this needs to be internationalized, maybe some others
> >>>> also...). Something like "Main applications" "Secondary
> >>>> applications", maybe 2 colors also ?
> >>>>
> >>>> This said, it's really a great effort and I think that there is
> not
> >>
> >>>> much to be done to be near perfection (at least nowadays ;o)
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes thank you for that !
> >>>>
> >>>> Jacques
> >>>>
> >>>>> Let me emphasize that Hotwax and Brainfood brought OFBiz to the
> >> next
> >>>>> level especially in the framework and graphical design areas.
> >>>>> Thank you!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Hans
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 16:21 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
> >>>>>> Now that we have some nice themes in place I'm wondering if we
> >>>>>> shouldn't change the default theme, especially for the
> back-end.
> >>
> >>>>>> The
> >>>>>> old blue-grey-flat theme (which we should probably move to a
> >> theme
> >>>>>> component) is functional and I suppose lightweight too, but
> >> perhaps
> >>>>>> doesn't give the best first impression.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Right now we have 2 alternative themes for the back-end (the
> >>>>>> bluelight
> >>>>>> theme and the smoothfeather theme which is meant to look like
> the
> >>
> >>>>>> new
> >>>>>> web site), and 1 alternative theme for ecommerce (the
> multiflex
> >>
> >>>>>> theme).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> One issue with all of these is they haven't been tested as
> >>>>>> thoroughly
> >>>>>> as the old stuff, but I'm not too worried about that because
> >>>>>> there are
> >>>>>> issues with the new default lots of people will see it soon
> and
> >> we
> >>>>>> should be able to get things fixed pretty fast. In my own
> testing
> >>
> >>>>>> both
> >>>>>> of the back-end ones seem pretty solid (I haven't played with
> >> the
> >>>>>> ecommerce one yet).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anyway, please respond with your thoughts on this. I
> considered
> >>>>>> opening a vote, but a general discussion is probably better
> first
> >>
> >>>>>> (and
> >>>>>> a vote may not be needed depending on how this discussion
> goes).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> BTW, yes, this is for marketing purposes and should happen
> before
> >>
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> release branch next Tuesday.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -David
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> -- 
> >>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>

Reply via email to