On Tuesday 08 of February 2005 17:59, David Dawes wrote: > On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:40:42PM +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:32:56AM -0500, David Dawes wrote: > >> It looks like the DRM kernel source in xc/extras/drm is broken and > >> incomplete, especially for BSD platforms. The Linux version only > >> appears to build for a narrow range of kernels, and this either > >> needs to be fixed, or the minimum kernel requirements enforced in > >> the Makefile. > >> > >> Perhaps we'll have to roll back to an older version that does build? > > > >I suspect pulling in a newer snapshot would be better, although it's > >a little more complicated now because the drm has split out support > >for linux 2.4 and 2.6 kernels is separate subdirectories. > > Does the build automatically figure out which to use based on the > kernel version, and what range of kernels has it been verified on? > > What about the FreeBSD code? The current version we have is very > broken, failing to build even the simplest of drivers (tdfx) on > 4.10 or 5.2. Also, does the i915 driver build on BSD? It is > referenced in the Makefile, but the required files are not present.
Just as a note: FreeBSD includes drm in its source since 5.0 release and 4.9 release in src/sys/dev/drm: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/drm/ The current code in FreeBSD CVS is based on 2004-05-26 DRI CVS. AFAIK Intel drivers are not yet supported. Dejan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@XFree86.Org http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
