Only have a few seconds for feedback just now, but we should change "What's Freenet" to "What is Freenet?", and "Freenet Features" to "Features". We should probably have more to explain what Freenet is, and the Download link in the "What's Freenet" section doesn't really belong there.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 3:02 AM, Dan Roberts ademan...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Everyone, I've put a new release up here: https://ademan-laptop.github.io/freenet-website-redesign-pelican/ Some resource images are broken due to the /freenet-website-redesign-pelican/ prefix, and I'm not certain there's a good way to fix this. (Relative paths break with our i18n_subsites usage). Please ignore that for the moment. Please take a look at the language menu's style, I extrapolated from the design we bought, but I am not really a designer. I think I'll change its functionality so that changing language keeps you on the same page. The language menu picks up any messages.mo files (generated from .po files) and gives them a language entry. I appreciate any and all constructive feedback. Thanks,Dan On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> wrote: Dan Roberts <ademan...@gmail.com> writes: > Hey Everyone, > I'll be posting the website for feedback tomorrow. Great! > I seem to constantly > find new things to fix, but I could probably nit-pick forever, That’s common problem ☺ > I'd like to also create and/or link to a google plus freenet page. I found > this: https://plus.google.com/communities/107006765679470608749 I think > it's worth having something. There’s also the Deep Web community: https://plus.google.com/communities/104253064892524682250 > I'll be removing the pinterest and instagram social media links unless > somebody thinks we should have a presence there too. There’s a difference between thinking we should be there and having someone who does it: If we had someone who maintains them, I’d say we should be there. According to teachers, instagram is where the cool people are are nowadays. If not, not. I think this goes for every social network. > The difference from twitter, google+ and facebook are that we > incidentally generate content to put on those sites (news items can be > copied and pasted and/or linked to), the more image-oriented social > media would take extra effort (that I don't believe would be worth > while). Sounds reasonable. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl Ian ClarkeStacks - Our AI will save your moneyhttp://trystacks.com/ _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
