Taran Rampersad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

 >>the point is that a lot of the technology we're discussing
should be encouraged by critical things - not by things that
artificially creating a need and building unrealistic explanations -

I wanted to say "hurrah" for this excellent point. I know that we could probably debate until the end of time what technology is the "right" technology for any given situation, but I do think that it's a much better-informed debate that can lead to more sustainable, more-audience-appropriate tech, than leaving the "discussion" to those with better advertising.

About half a dozen times, I've been approached by a senior manager who got bedazzled by a sales pitch and he's now decided that the organization, or those it serves, really need WhamBam software, or BlingBling Inc. hardware. And I've had to put together powerpoint presentations and cost benefit tables and narratives and interpretive dances to counter the argument of the salesmen, whose undone months of methodical, critically-thought-out strategic planning. Sometimes I'm successful, but often, I'm stuck, or the people we were serving get stuck, with WhamBam software and BlingBling Inc. hardware. All because a non-tech person got bedazzled by advertising.

One of the digital divides that needs to be bridged is helping people -- anywhere -- make informed choices about hardware and software, and being able to articulate and identify their own needs. but that's a rather huge goal in and of itself...


--
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Jayne Cravens Bonn, Germany

Services for Mission-Based Orgs
www.coyotecommunications.com

Open University Development Studies
www.coyotecommunications.com/development

Contact me
www.coyotecommunications.com/contact.html
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

_______________________________________________
DIGITALDIVIDE mailing list
DIGITALDIVIDE@mailman.edc.org
http://mailman.edc.org/mailman/listinfo/digitaldivide
To unsubscribe, send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word UNSUBSCRIBE 
in the body of the message.

Reply via email to