Hi, :-) On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 21:23, Michael Wheatland <mich...@wheatland.com.au> wrote: > Just to let you know we are definitely not tied to one product, in fact one > of the reasons that the steering committee decided to go with Drupal was > it's ability to leverage these tools and integrate it with workflows and > publishing systems within the Drupal framework.
Just for the sake of clarity and accuracy about this, there has been no *official decision* as yet to definitely go with a Drupal site. It's still under evaluation as such (this is what the steering committee meeting minutes confirm) [1]. What has actually been said up to present is this: "vote if to start with Silverstripe or Drupal result: 6 for Silverstripe vs. 2 for Drupal -> 2/3rd majority for Silverstripe reason to vote for Silverstripe was in most cases that a fast go-live is expected and that there are people to do administration and take care about content reason to vote for Drupal was the higher flexibility (and therefore better long-term solution) as well as having several people with good knowledge about drupal suggestion is that the website team should do some more planning, what we need regarding website, additional services, and see how this can be achieved with drupal. We see the need of a more sophisticated CMS in the future." The SC has not taken any other official decisions on the subject since that time... [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Minutes_2010-10-27 David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to documentation+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/documentation/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
