I'd say on 160m that although DXCC is possible (or was possible in the past)
on 160m, a high percentage of the contacts I have made on that band are not
possible with QRP. If there is a relatively common DXCC entity (who needs
another DL?) the odds are good for QRP given good conditions.  If it's a
rare one near the noise floor and you aren't lucky enough to be the first to
hear it and if conditions are not ideal, you are going to have to crack a
pileup--and if you are not QRO there is little chance of that on 160m.  That
is my experience--which is of course subjective.  But you can be a little
more objective if you look at the 160m DXCC list maintained my ARRL.  Start
at the top and work down till you find a few QRP operators.  There are none
for a long, long time.

The thrill of working BY on 160m at 1.5 kw is to me just as satisfying as
working 3A on 160m with 5w.  They are just very different activities, both a
lot of fun.

Bob W2WG

-----Original Message-----
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Steve Ellington
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 9:33 AM
To: dw; Elecraft_List
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Your Opinion: The realities of QRP vs. QRO

Obviously a troll.

Steve Ellington
n...@carolina.rr.com
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "dw" <bw...@fastmail.fm>
To: "Elecraft_List" <elecraft@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 7:34 AM
Subject: [Elecraft] Your Opinion: The realities of QRP vs. QRO


A few years back in our little farming community, there was a fellow
whose name was Francis.
Francis was an avid hunter.
At this time, the rumor went around the community that
Francis had been fined for deer jacking.
Out of his truck one night, with a spot light, he took a shot at a
plastic deer planted by game wardens.
Soon it became a joke...Sir Francis the deer slayer.

Something within me seemed to understand Francis' point of view.
He was a pragmatist... He had little interest in the thrill of the hunt.
He was focused on the efficiency of the catch.

Although QRO is far from illegal, it does seem to be somewhat more
focused on the efficiency of the catch than the thrill of the hunt.
So there is a certain un-romantic reality to QRO vs. QRP.

I'm wondering, what percentage of contacts you've made QRO, that you
would estimate as not attainable QRP.

I hope I didn't break the list rules getting off-topic with the story
:~/
-- 
  dw
  d...@sover.net

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.8/1985 - Release Date: 03/05/09 
07:54:00

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Reply via email to