On Sunday, January 08, 2012 07:36:21 PM Kent A. Reed did opine:

> On 1/7/2012 8:48 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 07, 2012 08:40:23 PM Kent A. Reed did opine:
> >> On 1/5/2012 8:46 PM, gene heskett wrote:
> >>> Where can I find some real docs on this isolcpu thingy?
> >> 
> >> Gene:
> >> 
> >> Quoting from kernel.org:
> >>    isolcpus=       [KNL,SMP] Isolate CPUs from the general scheduler.
> >>    
> >>                    Format:
> >> <blah blah blah>
> > 
> > I've read the first from kernel.org, and your wiki article (which I
> > expect to do on the new box arriving late Monday, thanks), but both
> > articles leave me scratching my head a wee bit.
> > 
> > It seems to me that if one is going to take a cpu core out of the SMP
> > scheduling effectively isolating it so its doing nothing, then one
> > should have a matching command associated with the RTAI load that
> > specifically puts the RTAI core to run on this 'saved' core, but I
> > haven't found how this can be assured to happen.
> > 
> > So that is my real&  not very well asked question, Kent.
> > 
> > Hows the missus doing?  Better I hope.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers, Gene
> 
> Okay, now I understand, Gene.
> 
> Unfortunately, I'm going to have to plead the old-timer defense. I can't
> remember where I read that RTAI (at least the way we configure it)
> chooses the last core with the attendant desirability of isolating it
> from the Linux scheduler. Maybe a core developer will straighten us out.
 
I don't recall reading that, but I also can't claim I have read everything 
ever written about RTAI.  Perhaps 10% of it maybe.

> I am mindful of one of my dad's favorite sayings "it's not what you
> don't know that gets you in trouble, it's what you know that ain't so."

That I think has been our life's quest.  Being innately curious over a 
subject area that is best described as eclectic, the JOAT in me finds as 
the years go by, its increasingly easy to start mixing up what I do know.  
Sometimes I may tell a story just to refresh my own memory of it, so I hope 
I'm not too boring when I do.
 
> And my wife is doing better than expected, thanks. Now if only we could
> find a way to eradicate the cause rather than treat the symptoms.

Great!  Good to hear!  And +100 to the cause discovery.

> Regards,
> Kent

Cheers, Gene
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: <http://coyoteden.dyndns-free.com:85/gene>
Words can never express what words can never express.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex
infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to
virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual 
desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure 
costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to