--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yagyax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ---Aristotle arrived at the conclusion that life is "Bliss" (he used > the phrase "Being-In-Itself") on the basis of his own experience, as > does (who's the person you're speaking on behalf of, Byron Katie?)? >>
That's right, attack the man, not the argument, there's a good Neocon. > But I keep up on modern philosophical topics, and haven't seen one > statement from academic circles pointing to the notion that "Life is > Bliss".>> Than you have not understood this modern and perfect argument below (written by me): "Existence exists, therefore interaction of the full potential of existence - its opposite potentials of point and infinity - occurs. Therefore activity occurs, therefore dynamism flourishes and propogates. You are that existence and its inherent dynamism. Thereforeyou are at home in that. Being at home, therefore you are happy in this universe, which is your cherished home where you grew up as a species. Therefore life is bliss, because you are always at home in this universe. All else is illusion. Therefore, life is bliss. All else is self-illusion, ie.untrue." > There's no more logical support for that conclusion than there is > that the moon is made of green cheese. You keep on saying one can > conclude that from logic, but your chain of premises is full of > holes, like cheese.. And you have zero logic or rationale or ANY argument whatsoever behind anything you say, except to attack me. Pathetic little man you are. OffWorld > > > In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "mathatbrahman" > > <mathatbrahman@> wrote: > > > > > > ---Offworld, your premises simply don't lead to the > > conclusion "Life > > > is Bliss". So, you're saying one can conclude this from logic > > alone? >> > > > > Absolutely. > > > > > Preposterous! There's no more weight to that conclusion from the > > > shoddy premises you have presented that the conclusion "Life is a > > > bummer, then you die"...which many intelligent logicians > believe.>> > > > > These are inexperienced and illogical "logicians" you speak of. > > To say "life is a bummer, and then you die" is like a child saying > > "I can't go to bed, there's a boogey man under the bed". > > I am being entirely descriptive here. Not sarcastic. The level of > > rational perception that comes up with such a thing, is weak, > > unfounded, and built on shifting sands. > > > > > Logic alone will not lead one to your conclusion, otherwise > > > Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle would have arrived at that. >> > > > > They did. > > > > > > Night night all. Sleep tight. > > > > OffWorld > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sinhlnx" <sinhlnx@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ---Off_world, your arguments amount to a tautology: >>> > > > > > > > > Thankyou. > > > > (you seem to be under the delusion that a tautology is a bad > > thing > > > in > > > > logic. It is actually the highest goal of logic. You're > > > understanding > > > > of tautology needs some serious attention and time spent > studying > > > it. > > > > Come back when you have studied it for 3 weeks minimum, full > > time.) > > > > > > > > <<Life is Bliss > > > > > because it's Bliss. >> > > > > > > > > Huh? > > > > > > > > <<First you said "at home" and then changed > > > > > to "Entirely comfortable"; but that's the problem! >>> > > > > > > > > No I am not. You are under the delusion that words are pure and > > > > perfect. Wrong. > > > > Every word or phrase has within it multiple layers of INHERENT > > > > meaning. Anyone watching this thread with a scintillating > > intellect > > > > embedded in their jyotish chart, is baffled by your lack of > > ability > > > > to see the inherent meaning I gave, which is not contradictory > to > > > the > > > > more succinct meaning I gave. > > > > > > > > <<You're changing > > > > > the definitions to suit your purpose and wind up with a self- > > > > evident > > > > > truth,>>> > > > > > > > > You just don't have the experience in logic to see its obvious > > > logic. > > > > > > > > <<a tautology, >> > > > > > > > > Yes. Thanks again. Tautology is the highest, most prized > > structure > > > of > > > > logic. I used to teach this stuff. > > > > > > > > <<since "Bliss" isn't that much of a stretch > > > > > from "entirely comfortable". > > > > > However, where in the world do you get the > premise, "entirely > > > > > comfortable", >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Bliss is entirely comfortable, as those who have experienced it > > > know. > > > > > > > > Total comfort is entirely blissful, as those who can appreciate > > it > > > to > > > > the fullest know. > > > > > > > > > > > > <<....where are those people, on the Pleides > > > > > planets?....cuz I sure don't see them on this planet!>> > > > > > > > > Yes, this planet is in ignorance and self-delusion...as the > > masters > > > > have stated time and time again. > > > > > > > > WAKE UP ! ! ! > > > > The truth is out there....and it is bliss. > > > > > > > > OffWorld > > > > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > >
