On 2021-10-27 09:55, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
23.10.2021 17:13, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
If record buffering is hard, it could have been done **without** it.
Then it would have been the choice of the user whether it is worth the
performance implications or not.
So you consider acceptable that forward-only usage of scrollable
cursors is 10x slower than for regular cursors? Personally, I consider
it hard to explain.
Yes, I think that is perfectly acceptable for an initial version.
Scrollable cursors are a bit of an oddity anyway, but having scrollable
cursors in embedded access, but not in remote access is IMHO less
acceptable than bad performance. As long as the performance behaviour is
clearly documented, people can make the decision if the bad performance
is worth the utility of scrollable cursors for themselves.
Mark
Firebird-Devel mailing list, web interface at
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/firebird-devel
