"Alan Teeder" wrote:
> Twice I left it running overnight, but it failed both times after several
> hours during the fgdata clone.
Which server do you clone from ? If you don't already do so, then you
should consider fetching the initial clone from mapserver and to change
the remote origin afterwards.
> The fact remains that I believe that the current fgdata is too large and is
> not fit for purpose. The need to re-organise it exists now, as it did last
> year. Perhaps you, or someone else, could comment on that.
Indeed, the current evil is asking for a *clever* solution but every of
those I've seen so far (at least most of them) had been ignoring one or
another quite relevant context and I think we're not well-advised to
embark on yet another significant evil to get rid of the current one.
I don't know the 'perfect' recipe either. My favourite would be to keep
just the default Cessna in the base package and to move all the other
aircraft into one single, separate repo .... but as far as I remember,
this plan doesn't have much support (for various reasons, I guess).
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;258768047;13503038;j?
http://info.appdynamics.com/FreeJavaPerformanceDownload.html
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
