Yes, there was a certain golden period of gp's building on Koza and others
work like  Forrest Bennett's Beowulf 1000-pentium cluster back in the late
90s.
https://www.genetic-programming.com/machine1000.html

I agree with you, Marcus, that it would be good to see versions of this
springing forth on modern architectures.

____________________________________________
CEO Founder, Simtable.com
stephen.gue...@simtable.com

Harvard Visualization Research and Teaching Lab
stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu

mobile: (505)577-5828

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, 4:18 PM Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com> wrote:

> I don’t understand why Genetic Programming hasn’t been a bigger thing.  It
> seems like another case, like ML, where having adequate hardware is key to
> really making it work.   I hope interest in AI will dust-off or reinvent
> many such approaches.    I don’t care who gets the credit.
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Roger Critchlow
> *Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2023 3:05 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam@redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Working for the Military Institute of Technology
> Causes Cognitive Dissonance
>
>
>
> I see I missed this on HackerNews yesterday, the comments cover a range of
> positions.
>
>
>
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38642651
>
>
>
> -- rec --
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:48 PM Roger Critchlow <r...@elf.org> wrote:
>
> On the subject of cognitive dissonance, and working for large research
> institutions
>
>
>
>    https://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/ai-priority-disputes.html
>
>
>
> in which Jürgen Schmidhuber complains that LeCun, Bengio, and Hinton claim
> to have invented modern AI when they were actually mostly reinventing,
> improving, and reimplementing 30 year old work from Schmidhuber's lab on
> faster hardware, without crediting any of the prior work.
>
>
>
> -- rec --
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:17 PM Marcus Daniels <mar...@snoutfarm.com>
> wrote:
>
> While I think LLMs will be hard to use for analysis tasks, there is
> something satisfying to see certain people squirm as LLMs, as Altman says,
> “Blow right through the Turing test.”
>
>
>
> *From:* Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> *On Behalf Of *Roger Frye
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 13, 2023 6:47 AM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <
> friam@redfish.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Working for the Military Institute of Technology
> Causes Cognitive Dissonance
>
>
>
> Eric,
>
>
>
> I agree with your critique, especially about Dresser's two-facedness. What
> struck me most was how Chomsky’s cognitive dissonance about military
> application could drive him to abstraction and unworkable theory.
>
>
>
> Chomsky has been one of my heroes. I have marched with him, but never
> agreed with his linguistics. But then never fully agreed with any linguist.
>
>
>
> I worked with people back in the 60s at Bolt Beranek and Newman and with
> professors at MIT who believed they could communicate with computers in
> English but was unaware of the military intention. I created English style
> GUIs and wrote COBOL compilers, but none very successful. Who knew that AI
> chat would be so successful this year.
>
>
>
> -Roger
>
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2023, at 3:34 AM, David Eric Smith <desm...@santafe.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> Wanted to say thank you for this.
>
>
>
> I don’t know that I find Dresser’s psychologizing of Chomsky persuasive at
> all.  But it’s nice that what leaks through the general history is
> Chomsky’s commitment as an operator.
>
>
>
> I liked that they had the little video clip in there.  What comes through
> (to me, so bright that it quenches out everything else) is the one constant
> of Chomsky, across his history and in all the modes of his activity: the
> superciliousness, and the attitude of Olympian contempt he puts on, at all
> times, standing in judgment of everyone and everything.
>
>
>
> The way Dresser doesn’t roll over to Chomsky’s assertion of absolute
> domination, in the main text, was kind of a relief, though his blithe
> dismissal of Chomsky’s having had any substantive reason for being an
> influencer looked like trouble.  The comments — surprisingly content-rich —
> unpack that trouble, but even there the exchange is interesting.  The
> defenders say Dresser misses the point of the syntactic work and
> mis-represents by taking things out of context (I think probably true), and
> then Dresser answers by providing explicit statements that are hard to
> understand as being any less ridiculous than he claims, since they are
> asserted with characteristic Chomskian authoritarianism.  What I take this
> for is evidence of what I see as the major pattern: Chomsky’s writing is as
> close to Newspeak as we probably have in something that is glossed by some
> as a science (and that, in a good world, could be, and is trying to become,
> more of a science).  His writing, over the decades and lots of books (here
> referring to the linguistics) has essentially no stable constructive
> assertions, yet at every point the delivery is “This is what I say and this
> is what I have always said.”
>
>
>
> (Not that Dresser comes out of this looking like any much-better
> character.  Claiming he isn’t out to write a hit-piece on Chomsky’s
> intellectual contributions, while transparently wanting mainly to do that,
> and then at the end saying how grateful he is for Chomsky’s activism, rings
> pretty disingenuous.  I am also struck because to me the style of The Man
> is recognizably the same in both.  But enough on Dresser.  He will be
> forgotten by tomorrow, so one can just comment on the content of the
> writing.)
>
>
>
> I don’t know where Chomsky ranks in the guruness indices.  But he is a
> case study in the patterns of meme-authoritarianism.  A vast discourse of
> negative statements, which (seen in many people I have to deal with) seem
> to have only the goal of denying something specific somebody else is trying
> to say or to do, accompanied by shifting, or shifty, assertive-sounding
> statements, but ones that turn out to be slippery enough that you are never
> permitted to attach a meaning to them and decide for yourself whether they
> are valid or not.  Any judgment you pass against the constructive-sounding
> statements can always be parried by an accusation that you are too low a
> life-form to have understood the wisdom they encode.  Johnny Yune did this
> nicely in the ancient camp-movie They Call me Bruce (maybe the sequel), in
> the line “You are not ready for the tech-a-niques of the master.)
>
>
>
> Not sure why I feel compelled to compose typologies of the styles of
> shiftiness in the world.  The impulse to see some fingerprints that occur
> repeatedly seems to scratch some itch.
>
>
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Roger Frye <frye.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> <essay-157299658_3368747809897548_2339859844184523781_n.jpg>
>
> An anthropologist studies the warring ideas of Noam Chomsky | Aeon Essays
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2faeon.co%2fessays%2fan-anthropologist-studies-the-warring-ideas-of-noam-chomsky&c=E,1,7kZuJYAm_YL7i7F0egYQsLXP5J6KarwCykLLNp7F7CSfoIIKPZn_Qrb7kxCJRXulltZqQihTJMMfC53SQ0bvcA3AQCN0Y7NE5w1PBhbuK9UIO5D_1Bk,&typo=1>
>
> aeon.co
> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2faeon.co%2fessays%2fan-anthropologist-studies-the-warring-ideas-of-noam-chomsky&c=E,1,UbK_htNAn_PvXjC3vbBAs8ixXUNIJF5MhDxmCk8F56ppp2bp03KJxJTrYpiEX_Ml458OCZuaUPcXES3KpNQru4Y9f7BqLTonE5v4p6tyLA,,&typo=1>
>
>
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,RVh5I_OSkx6gAWMMOkKEYLQOEJN74xKK5R3la6mfTpmPlt1IBjVazeSbQSTbKbAxQji87grlMApg1r4fLjhWq0uLpRlcWoygnnQstrlhZ1WhCZozkdI,&typo=1
> to (un)subscribe
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,ZbtdTuHCsdPl2Rh_N05LMdRWY4qr7p8adVsWunB6YZ-bBCU6bAN9OzOEF7Js-xnCkEfyZyy2o4KbcxRkjrRcFJhsE7_UNLYp65FosiTKM5sqyQ,,&typo=1
> FRIAM-COMIC
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,1o3MuIdAd2B-h91edK12jG0ZRGDbXW3O9Z3Keix2OCfOz4O4vWukURT1tBUfKI9AvKREkNcCOXZRDUfuWf6ijvoygeJXn0Fma9P2i4_HP5VupJQ5HmqmNes-4M4,&typo=1
> archives:  5/2017 thru present
> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,11ngnGtLTcEqISne021xnGG2C0Th13t9-_Gl4fZ9bj5kdEq0KMKSUXo-dXKyElLRUDKvsi24tT4266OxHrMDzj5CIilBY6suS-JAQLOvcFGTGOQ,&typo=1
>  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
>
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
>
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
> -. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
> https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
> to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
> FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
> archives:  5/2017 thru present
> https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
>   1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
>
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to