Proofs, library development.  Koza’s second book introduced the latter idea.   
(Just using the facilities that are inherent to programming languages.)  These 
days there are good, mature functional programming languages.  Lean would be 
versatile.

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of Russ Abbott
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2023 11:16 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Working for the Military Institute of Technology Causes 
Cognitive Dissonance

Interesting idea. I wonder what you could produce running massive computing 
power for many weeks on GP and RL. The thing about LLMs is that they are 
general-purpose products. What sort of general-purpose product might one try to 
create using GP and/or RL and massive computing power over an extended period?

-- Russ Abbott
Professor Emeritus, Computer Science
California State University, Los Angeles


On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 5:40 PM Stephen Guerin 
<stephen.gue...@simtable.com<mailto:stephen.gue...@simtable.com>> wrote:
Yes, there was a certain golden period of gp's building on Koza and others work 
like  Forrest Bennett's Beowulf 1000-pentium cluster back in the late 90s.
https://www.genetic-programming.com/machine1000.html

I agree with you, Marcus, that it would be good to see versions of this 
springing forth on modern architectures.

____________________________________________
CEO Founder, Simtable.com
stephen.gue...@simtable.com<mailto:stephen.gue...@simtable.com>

Harvard Visualization Research and Teaching Lab
stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu<mailto:stephengue...@fas.harvard.edu>

mobile: (505)577-5828

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023, 4:18 PM Marcus Daniels 
<mar...@snoutfarm.com<mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com>> wrote:
I don’t understand why Genetic Programming hasn’t been a bigger thing.  It 
seems like another case, like ML, where having adequate hardware is key to 
really making it work.   I hope interest in AI will dust-off or reinvent many 
such approaches.    I don’t care who gets the credit.

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com<mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On 
Behalf Of Roger Critchlow
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2023 3:05 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
<friam@redfish.com<mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Working for the Military Institute of Technology Causes 
Cognitive Dissonance

I see I missed this on HackerNews yesterday, the comments cover a range of 
positions.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38642651

-- rec --

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:48 PM Roger Critchlow 
<r...@elf.org<mailto:r...@elf.org>> wrote:
On the subject of cognitive dissonance, and working for large research 
institutions

   https://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/ai-priority-disputes.html

in which Jürgen Schmidhuber complains that LeCun, Bengio, and Hinton claim to 
have invented modern AI when they were actually mostly reinventing, improving, 
and reimplementing 30 year old work from Schmidhuber's lab on faster hardware, 
without crediting any of the prior work.

-- rec --

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:17 PM Marcus Daniels 
<mar...@snoutfarm.com<mailto:mar...@snoutfarm.com>> wrote:
While I think LLMs will be hard to use for analysis tasks, there is something 
satisfying to see certain people squirm as LLMs, as Altman says, “Blow right 
through the Turing test.”

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com<mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com>> On 
Behalf Of Roger Frye
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2023 6:47 AM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group 
<friam@redfish.com<mailto:friam@redfish.com>>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Working for the Military Institute of Technology Causes 
Cognitive Dissonance

Eric,

I agree with your critique, especially about Dresser's two-facedness. What 
struck me most was how Chomsky’s cognitive dissonance about military 
application could drive him to abstraction and unworkable theory.

Chomsky has been one of my heroes. I have marched with him, but never agreed 
with his linguistics. But then never fully agreed with any linguist.

I worked with people back in the 60s at Bolt Beranek and Newman and with 
professors at MIT who believed they could communicate with computers in English 
but was unaware of the military intention. I created English style GUIs and 
wrote COBOL compilers, but none very successful. Who knew that AI chat would be 
so successful this year.

-Roger

On Dec 13, 2023, at 3:34 AM, David Eric Smith 
<desm...@santafe.edu<mailto:desm...@santafe.edu>> wrote:

Wanted to say thank you for this.

I don’t know that I find Dresser’s psychologizing of Chomsky persuasive at all. 
 But it’s nice that what leaks through the general history is Chomsky’s 
commitment as an operator.

I liked that they had the little video clip in there.  What comes through (to 
me, so bright that it quenches out everything else) is the one constant of 
Chomsky, across his history and in all the modes of his activity: the 
superciliousness, and the attitude of Olympian contempt he puts on, at all 
times, standing in judgment of everyone and everything.

The way Dresser doesn’t roll over to Chomsky’s assertion of absolute 
domination, in the main text, was kind of a relief, though his blithe dismissal 
of Chomsky’s having had any substantive reason for being an influencer looked 
like trouble.  The comments — surprisingly content-rich — unpack that trouble, 
but even there the exchange is interesting.  The defenders say Dresser misses 
the point of the syntactic work and mis-represents by taking things out of 
context (I think probably true), and then Dresser answers by providing explicit 
statements that are hard to understand as being any less ridiculous than he 
claims, since they are asserted with characteristic Chomskian authoritarianism. 
 What I take this for is evidence of what I see as the major pattern: Chomsky’s 
writing is as close to Newspeak as we probably have in something that is 
glossed by some as a science (and that, in a good world, could be, and is 
trying to become, more of a science).  His writing, over the decades and lots 
of books (here referring to the linguistics) has essentially no stable 
constructive assertions, yet at every point the delivery is “This is what I say 
and this is what I have always said.”

(Not that Dresser comes out of this looking like any much-better character.  
Claiming he isn’t out to write a hit-piece on Chomsky’s intellectual 
contributions, while transparently wanting mainly to do that, and then at the 
end saying how grateful he is for Chomsky’s activism, rings pretty 
disingenuous.  I am also struck because to me the style of The Man is 
recognizably the same in both.  But enough on Dresser.  He will be forgotten by 
tomorrow, so one can just comment on the content of the writing.)

I don’t know where Chomsky ranks in the guruness indices.  But he is a case 
study in the patterns of meme-authoritarianism.  A vast discourse of negative 
statements, which (seen in many people I have to deal with) seem to have only 
the goal of denying something specific somebody else is trying to say or to do, 
accompanied by shifting, or shifty, assertive-sounding statements, but ones 
that turn out to be slippery enough that you are never permitted to attach a 
meaning to them and decide for yourself whether they are valid or not.  Any 
judgment you pass against the constructive-sounding statements can always be 
parried by an accusation that you are too low a life-form to have understood 
the wisdom they encode.  Johnny Yune did this nicely in the ancient camp-movie 
They Call me Bruce (maybe the sequel), in the line “You are not ready for the 
tech-a-niques of the master.)

Not sure why I feel compelled to compose typologies of the styles of shiftiness 
in the world.  The impulse to see some fingerprints that occur repeatedly seems 
to scratch some itch.

Eric



On Dec 8, 2023, at 7:54 AM, Roger Frye 
<frye.ro...@gmail.com<mailto:frye.ro...@gmail.com>> wrote:

<essay-157299658_3368747809897548_2339859844184523781_n.jpg>
An anthropologist studies the warring ideas of Noam Chomsky | Aeon 
Essays<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2faeon.co%2fessays%2fan-anthropologist-studies-the-warring-ideas-of-noam-chomsky&c=E,1,7kZuJYAm_YL7i7F0egYQsLXP5J6KarwCykLLNp7F7CSfoIIKPZn_Qrb7kxCJRXulltZqQihTJMMfC53SQ0bvcA3AQCN0Y7NE5w1PBhbuK9UIO5D_1Bk,&typo=1>
aeon.co<https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2faeon.co%2fessays%2fan-anthropologist-studies-the-warring-ideas-of-noam-chomsky&c=E,1,UbK_htNAn_PvXjC3vbBAs8ixXUNIJF5MhDxmCk8F56ppp2bp03KJxJTrYpiEX_Ml458OCZuaUPcXES3KpNQru4Y9f7BqLTonE5v4p6tyLA,,&typo=1>

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fbit.ly%2fvirtualfriam&c=E,1,RVh5I_OSkx6gAWMMOkKEYLQOEJN74xKK5R3la6mfTpmPlt1IBjVazeSbQSTbKbAxQji87grlMApg1r4fLjhWq0uLpRlcWoygnnQstrlhZ1WhCZozkdI,&typo=1
to (un)subscribe 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,ZbtdTuHCsdPl2Rh_N05LMdRWY4qr7p8adVsWunB6YZ-bBCU6bAN9OzOEF7Js-xnCkEfyZyy2o4KbcxRkjrRcFJhsE7_UNLYp65FosiTKM5sqyQ,,&typo=1
FRIAM-COMIC 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,1o3MuIdAd2B-h91edK12jG0ZRGDbXW3O9Z3Keix2OCfOz4O4vWukURT1tBUfKI9AvKREkNcCOXZRDUfuWf6ijvoygeJXn0Fma9P2i4_HP5VupJQ5HmqmNes-4M4,&typo=1
archives:  5/2017 thru present 
https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fpipermail%2ffriam_redfish.com%2f&c=E,1,11ngnGtLTcEqISne021xnGG2C0Th13t9-_Gl4fZ9bj5kdEq0KMKSUXo-dXKyElLRUDKvsi24tT4266OxHrMDzj5CIilBY6suS-JAQLOvcFGTGOQ,&typo=1
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to