29 Matthew Weier O'Phinney <matt...@zend.com>: > -- Antonio José García Lagar <a...@garcialagar.es> wrote > (on Thursday, 29 October 2009, 08:17 PM +0100): >> 2009/10/29 Matthew Weier O'Phinney <matt...@zend.com> >> >> >> Ideally, we'll have both Doctrine 1.x and 2.x integration, for this very >> reason - though likely as separate implementations (Zend_Doctrine, >> Zend_Doctrine2). There are some commonalities between them that we can >> leverage immediately (application resources, in particular), and others >> that will require more collaboration between the two projects (e.g., >> shared cache objects and loggers, etc.).
I must say its a shame that ZE is going, I thought it was too bigger a project for one person, not fair asking for that much commitment from anyone. Time to go back to using Doctrine then :( bye bye nice models..... Do you think it would be a good idea to update the Quickstart guide now to not use the Data Mapper pattern and use doctrine instead? >> >> >> Do you think this will be available for the 1.10 release? >> >> You should update the roadmap at http://framework.zend.com/roadmap/1.10.0 >> >> I hope to see an early proposal to start to help. > > We're in the very early stages of gathering requirements; I honestly > don't see it being ready for 1.10. > > -- > Matthew Weier O'Phinney > Project Lead | matt...@zend.com > Zend Framework | http://framework.zend.com/ > -- ------------ http://www.thepopeisdead.com
