On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi... > > The idea sounds good in general more specifically that should be clear > and documented on the incubator site for future incubating projects. But, > IMHO, we should categorize projects mentioned in that list from very old to > recent ones and each group of mentors get in touch with their mentored > projects and get with some feedback about such plan, so we can be more fair > and give people a chance either to do some progress, more specifically for > recent incubated projects and even for the older projects to revive if that > is possible. > > Thoughts ?
Nobody is proposing immediate expulsion of any PPMC based solely on a metric. On the other hand, it should not be a surprise to mentors that they are responsible for[1] "assessment of the Podling status with respect to continuation/exit strategy". Reports for PPMCs that are older than a year should be expected to contain this information. Repeated failure to include such information and/or demonstrate forward progress towards meeting these objectives should cause the Incubator (not the Board!) to take action. - Sam Ruby [1] http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Roles_and_Responsibilities.html#Mentor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
