On Saturday 23 May 2009, Roy Marples wrote: > Basically as Doug said, each OpenRC version comes with a few big > chances. Well not massive as in "your box will break now", but just a > different spin on how things should work. OpenRC-0.5 will have the > biggest re-spin to date - net.lo (net.eth0 etc) is considered > deprecated.
If future changes of this magnitude are still expected, I wonder if we want to go stable with OpenRC anytime soon. I do not intend to hinder fast progress and design changes in OpenRC in any way, but if its design is not considered final, I suggest we do not make it the default recommandation for our users. Marking it stable might also be contraproductive for upstream since revised configurations need to stay supported a lot longer than they would had they been used only by ~arch users. Robert
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
