-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/15/2013 06:43 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 18:41:18 +0200 hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> > wrote: >> On 06/15/2013 06:24 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: >>> Why not fix the specs? > >> from council log >> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20120911.txt > >> <Chainsaw> Okay for EAPI 5. *Nothing* gets applied >> retroactively. *EVER* > >> So that means some people think it doesn't even matter what the >> issue is. We never fix the spec, we just enhance it. > >> Oh, you asked for reasoning... > > If you want the reasoning for that decision, you should look at > the entire log, and not just one line of it. > >
I was not talking about that decision. Stop derailing threads on -dev. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRvJoRAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzSE4H/iFVg/nfbMczic8xj7h/46A5 noMJ29KdJYaT9CKan9gD3vEpH8GuPwaZYSXIrfagPI3FV7ovJS6+hluGuTuzoaiQ FL9Zh3aam4mO6P5ds7yKz53Her5uM6N/wf58/81EFy4bVtNebWDbYmD8xvC/oe7i U6k4gH/PWxSd8HJCngA5lRk4/xLPeR5YKfWsvOOiQEJ+908s8Vw7nEtGIvlXKRjN +ujTlxW182jauWlV0S92KgNdsMqWk8OctJnWT2G02PqqQ6DzXkxUeKbakN9STbVM SVVbWJLTTKvQ+lfYGcIJroaA7RhR0GQqQ6HvebfIrgQiTY6kfzHpQqElA9iH6qs= =2cmH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
