On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:56:00 -0400 > Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> If we find that all known implementations of PMS/EAPI 4 have >> implemented a certain behavior, making a change to that version of PMS >> to properly document the behavior seems reasonable. > > Part of the point of EAPI stability is that it doesn't just apply to > current versions of package manglers. >
So look back at the first versions which implemented EAPI 4 support, and see what the behavior was implemented at the point in time.
