On 03/08/2013 02:50 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote: >> 1. The craziness of trying to conserve IPv4 space >> 2. NAT. Finally, a good solid techical reason to make NAT just go away >> and stay away. Permanently. Forever. > > It's a great shame that isn't all it fixed (ipv5), then your job > wouldn't have been so hard and there wouldn't be any reason for many of > us to cling to ipv4 of which there are many strong reasons that are far > far worse than NAT. > >
IPv5 never really existed. http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2003/06/what_ever_happened_to_ipv5.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
