On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:41:13PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote > The trouble with NAT is that it destroys peer-to-peer protocols. The > first was FTP in Active mode.
In its day, it was OK. Nowadays, we use passive mode. What's the problem? > SIP has been heavily damaged as well. Anyone who's used IRC is > familiar with the problems NAT introduces to DCC. Every ADSL router-modem I've run into recently has port-forwarding. > Anyone who's ever played video games online,... A *CLIENT* that can't operate from behind NAT is totally brain-dead. > or who's tried hosting a Teamspeak or Ventrillo server, has had NAT > get in their way as well. Port-forwarding. -- Walter Dnes <waltd...@waltdnes.org> I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
