On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 09:46:41PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > I've just read your outdated page > It is not outdated. Since more than a year, there is no visible development > in cdrkit.
Not visible to you. cdrkit-1.1.8 at http://cdrkit.org/releases/ is dated 25.05.2008. It would be prudent for them to bring their website up-to-date, though. > So I asume that they did not add new bugs. Maybe you should assume less and research more. > > <http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/linux-dist.html>. Where you > > listed specific bugs, I see they don't affect me (and can't imagine > > they'd affect most users). Most of what you cite as bugs are just > > features they haven't implemented yet (and for all I know, they > > have since you wrote that page). > This is obviously FUD: Just because you don't already know that you > are affected does not mean that you are not affected. Of course not. Even the linux-kernel mailing-list hasn't seen your light, yet. > It would be fun to see you in 5 years after your then current OS > won't read your DVDs anymore because of the bugs in the filesystem > structure. It would be fun if you would finally stop trolling forums, newsgroups and mailing-lists and keep your FUD and ego problems to yourself. You obviously take it as a personal insult that cdrtools was snubbed by some distributions and that somebody else is working on a replacement. Your constant ridicule and insults of a project you shouldn't care about at all is very telling, considering the alleged superiority of your own project. Thankfully, the GPL allows forks to eventually get rid of project leaders like you. -- >P.S. der neue Automat da oben ist echt ein Scherzkeks. Will Noten >annehmen hat aber keinen Schlitz dafür. probier doch mal, was zu singen, vielleicht hat er ja ein Mikrofon -- Matthias Dingeldein in de.etc.bahn.misc -- gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
