Ben Scott wrote: > On the third hand: I have been told by real lawyers that if ones > does not take consistent action to protect a trademark, you loose your > trademark rights, and it becomes "generic". That would imply that to > protect the GNHLUG trademark, we would have to define formal terms for > its use. Ugh. Can of worms again. :-/
Its not too bad really. I've done it several times. It just takes time and a bit of money, and a lawyer's services. On yet another hand, I've got a at least one 3c501 that's willing (within limitations) to act as a "fiscal agent" for GNHLUG if the need ever arises. However, I believe they would want to set things up in advance if this avenue were desirable. --Bruce _______________________________________________ gnhlug-org mailing list gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org
