Shmuel I do not recall any (thats not to say there weren't). The auditor was trying to keep the DC on its toes and I was seemed to be a step ahead. Like I said I didn't mind as it showed to the brass that I was on the top of the game.
Ed ________________________________ From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 1:56 PM Subject: Re: A Set and B set of z/OS system In <1315847027.38063.yahoomailmob...@web161426.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>, on 09/12/2011 at 10:03 AM, Ed Gould <ps2...@yahoo.com> said: >No PE's. I really was on the ball and I was using IBMLINK to keep >on top of maintenance. The question isn't whether *you* were on the ball, it's whether the auditors were. I'm surprised that there weren't PE's on some of the PTF's they asked you about. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
