Godmar Back wrote:
>
> >
> > Personally, although I'm not on the Japhar dev. team, I think the LGPL affords
> > you plenty of freedom to work with the library. LGPL explicitly allows code
> > (I.E. JNI stuff) to be linked against Japhar without being also free, so all
> > commercial Java stuff can eventually work under it.
> >
>
> Kaffe's GPL allows you to load and run proprietary Java classes and
> JNI libraries.
>
Then I take it it is a modified GPL?
> Without specific reference to the post to which I'm replying:
> In general, I'd like it if we simply accepted the choice of license that
> the developers of a given project made. This is especially true if the
> discussion is about what variety of open source license is being used.
> After all, it's them who wrote and license the code to us.
agreed :)
xtoph
