On 5/20/06, Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That programmers in other languages don't succeed in writing their own
RAD, doesn't mean that we have to provide them with one, imho.
But if someone else want to do that... be my guest. I'm not gonna do it.
But then, people who like working with Lazarus might be forced to use
other languages by those who pay us. This way we can make those people
and also also us happy.
Of course I don't think those who don't pass by this situation should
be forced to help implementing it.
The biggest problem is that I cannot see the advantage of adding c++
for Lazarus for example, without allowing it to access LCL. This would
make it just another text editor, and there is plenty already. Maybe a
C++_to_pascal converter could help in this situation.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
