> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 17:21:54 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com>
> To: LFS Developers Mailinglist <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org>
> Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] Thoughts about LFS and systemd
>
.
.
>
> I understand your concerns, but the development branch is for, well,
> development. If what goes there needs to be reverted, that's not a
> problem. [...]
Yes, and 'experimental' branches are often best for such degree/extent
of experiment.
Maybe I'm just so used to git - where e.g. branches are so 'inexpensive' -
that it seems an absolute no-brainer that work of this type would be done
on a separate branch.
And in any event, you're still aiming at adding an "ifs'n'buts" layer to
the lfs-main book - the type of thing that has been argued against many
many times.
I do think that the idea is of interest: but it's really a candidate for
a separate branch/project.
rgds,
akh
--
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
