Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2014, 12:33 +0200 schrieb Thierry Nuttens: > Hello. > > I thing its a very good idea to go for a possibility to choose between > systemd and SySV. Simply because, it's an endless debate, peoples are for > SySV or for systemD, both parties are convinced by they choice.
That is for sure true for the phase of building a LFS system but I cannot see a benefit in having both systems installed in the final OS. It is not clear to me why I would want to boot once using sysv and once using systemd. BLFS packages do either use systemd or not, depending in which environment they are built but I hardly believe that they do it as a runtime choice. Can you give me a hint why I should have both on the machine at the same time? Or did I misunderstood the whole discussion? > > For dbus, with the kdbus module coming slowly in the stable branch of the > kernel, they is a chance that we will be able to skip it in the future the > need of dbus in a systemd LFS. > > > By the way, I would like to congratulate for your superbe job on LFS/ BLFS. > keep going. Very very true! I'd like to have more spare time to contribute a bit more to the (B)LFS project. > > BR, > > Thierry > Thomas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
