Hey all, I can only suggest what we do at Apache Logging Services that
seems to work well for us. Have seperate user & dev list for each sub
product (so a user and dev for Lucene for Java, or what ever), have a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for discussions that are relevant
to all sub-products (agreeing on file formats etc, interoperability
issues, trading dessert recipies), and a private pmc@ list.
Anyway, good luck guys.
cheers,
Paul
Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
I'm with Garrett. I think we do need a top level dev@ list for
discussion of cross-port issues, like index format and compatibility,
etc. We also need per-port and per-app lists.
Otis
--- Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I've amended my request for e-mail lists here with Doug's
preference:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-195
Do others agree this is the best approach? I don't mean to be
autocratic. Do we imagine different pools of users and developers
for
different Lucene sub-projects, or one big pool for all of them? I
assume they'll be mostly disjoint.
Personally I'm in favor of separate lists for subprojects, with a
separate list for the top level for discussing things like changing
file
formats and other stuff that more than one port would need to be
concerned about. I didn't bring it up before since I'm the new kid
on
the block and I didn't want to seem presumptuous.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
