On 17 July 2017 at 00:48, Enrico Forestieri <for...@lyx.org> wrote: > Dear Christian, > > I see that the operated obfuscation of issues is working with you. >
Dear Enrico, Don't worry, all is not lost and any operation obfuscation has not yet succeeded in invading Sweden. I still know that I don't know this topic well enough to have a very useful opinion. But perhaps better to continue discussing this in a more suitable thread? Otherwise my plan for world domination by using clang-format to obfuscate the entire LyX code base in one fell swoop will drown in discussions that actually matter ;-) > At the moment, there is no security problem with minted. > On the contrary > there is a big question about security of features that were either > present or recently introduced. Of course, it was the ability by which > these questions were treated that lead you to think that the problem > is minted, specifically, while it is not. ATM, in no way you can risk > something if you decide to use minted. > It's good to know although I'm anyway not personally at risk, unfortunately I'm currently not writing in LyX. Cheers, /Christian
