On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:31:37AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, [UTF-8] Uwe StïÃïÂïhr wrote: > > > I covers now nearly all math constructs. I want to replace the mathed > > section in the userguide by this documentation. > > In my opinion the tutorial has a very good introduction to mathed: It > > explains navigating in formulas, the math-panel and the most common used > > constructs (fractions etc.). So that we could go deeper in the > > userguide. Mathed supports so many constructs that aren't explained in > > the docs at the moment. > > > > Are there any objections against this plan? > > I doubt that... the only concern I can think of is that it might be too > much/advanced?
That's what I was about to say. We (a Maths professor and myself) intentionally *did* *not* cover all possible mathed features in the User's Guide precisely because of scope. Better to move the more esoteric features into the Extended doc. -- John Weiss
