Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high quality audio?

[lewst]

> I am a musician.  I notice crap when I go below 192.  I would stay
> at 224 or 256.  your options are fine.  If you have a bunch of files
> to do then use a batch process.

Thanks for your response.  Another question is whether VBR or CBR
produces better quality sound?  For example, how do the following
compare?

% lame -h -b 192 sample.wav sample.mp3

  VS.

% lame -h -v -b 112 sample.wav sample.mp3


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send online invitations with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )