> > VBR in theory will produce better quality with smaller filesizes.
> > In your case I would suggest something like: -h -V3 -b160.  
> 
> "-h -V3 -b160" does produce smaller files than "-h -b 192", but which
> one produces better quality?

I would suggest the VBR would be better quality because hard-to-encode
frames would use even higher than 192.

Ross.
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to