Re: [MP3 ENCODER] best LAME options for high quality audio?

[Sean Harding]

On Mon Apr 17 at 02:42:19 PM, lewst wrote:

> "-h -V3 -b160" does produce smaller files than "-h -b 192", but which
> one produces better quality?

Why not try both and decide for yourself?

sean

-- 
Sean Harding [EMAIL PROTECTED]        |"Don't think everybody is gonna  
http://www.dogcow.org/sean/             | choose your side."
                                        | --Natalie Merchant
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )