On Wednesday 13 November 2013 15:39:27 Michael Schnell wrote: > On 11/13/2013 02:27 PM, Martin Schreiber wrote: > > therefore "int64: 2;" is invalid, i > > I don't agree that this is sensible, but it's up to you. > > how would you define a bitpacked record filed with two bits that is > intended to be handled as a signed integer ? > " type recordty = bitpacked record x2: -2 to 1; x3: -2 to 1: 2; //same as above x4: 0 to 5: 4; //subrange in 4 bits end; "
Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
