Hallo Marcos, Du schriebst am Mon, 8 May 2017 13:12:19 -0300:
> >> 2. In this case: > >> obj2: ^objty; //on heap > >> > >> Is it possible to remove the "^"? > >> obj2.f1:= 123; > >> > > No, obj2 is a pointer. > > > >> I think this distinction exists because "class" exists, right? How does that behave in case of _nested objects_, possibly with identically named fields, which might even be of different types? Is that manageable, or will the construct break down, at least on "pathological" casses? (I'm afraid it _will_ break down.) -- -- (Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list mseide-msegui-talk@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
