At 23:04 -0400 10 May 2001, adam morley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:43:28AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > format=flowed requires a lot more implementation than just adding a
> > content-type header, iirc.
I wouldn't really say "a lot more" (at least when not dealing with
quoted text), but definitely more.
> well, if i write my messages so they are wrapped like this as you will
You mean not wrapped.
> see in one second, then it can be classified as a flowed message. a
I suppose it *could* be classified as such, but I don't see much point
in doing so. The whole point of format=flowed is so that paragraphs
will wrap in programs that support it, but still be readable with
programs that don't do wrapping.
It also doesn't follow part of RFC 2646:
] When generating Format=Flowed text, lines SHOULD be shorter than 80
] characters. As suggested values, any paragraph longer than 79
Your nested quoting was also done incorrectly. According to section 4.5
of RFC 2646 there should be no space between the '>' marks at the start
of quoted lines.
--
Aaron Schrab [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.execpc.com/~aarons/
... very sad life. Probably have very sad death but at least there
is symmetry. -- Zathras
