Quoting adam morley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:34:03AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > At 23:04 -0400 10 May 2001, adam morley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:43:28AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > > see in one second, then it can be classified as a flowed message.  a
> > 
> > I suppose it *could* be classified as such, but I don't see much point
> > in doing so.  The whole point of format=flowed is so that paragraphs
> > will wrap in programs that support it, but still be readable with
> > programs that don't do wrapping.
> 
> well, the whole point is that ppl dont like unwrapped text.  so one solution has 
>been format=flowed.
> 
> any others?

Don't send unwrapped text?

Sam

-- 
Sam Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to