>At 5:38 PM -0500 on 2/18/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>In a message dated 2/18/2000 12:36:50 PM, you wrote: >> >><< As a special exception, integrated combinations of FreeCard in >> executable form with your stacks to be displayed using >> FreeCard is permitted under your choice of license, provided >> the license does not permit extraction of the FreeCard >> executable from the combination.>> >> >>wouldn't that prevent some kinda freecard for applications, like VB for >>applications? > >I don't understand the reference to VB -- never used (or heard of) "VB >for applications." Could you please elaborate? MS Applications, to my knowledge, have VB for Applications within them so that you can script them in VB, kinda like OSA only better (or worse).
- OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code MP0werd
- Re: Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for code DeRobertis
- Re: Re: Re: OODL: Licence to use for c... M. Uli Kusterer
- Re: OODL: Licence to use for code Mark Rauterkus